Barker v. Sheriff
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe the unchallenged evidence adduced at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. See concurring opinion by Zenoff, J., in Franklin v. State, 89 Nev. 382, 389, 513 P.2d 1252, 1257 (1973). Cf. Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587 (1961); McWilliams v. State, 87 Nev. 302, 486 P.2d 481 (1971).
“[W]e are not now concerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- McDonald v. Sheriff of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Goldsmith v. Sheriff of Lyon CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- McGee v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Barker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979