Legal Opinion

Pinchem v. Regal Medical Group, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 9, 2017No. Case No 2:15-cv-06518-ODW (KLSx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [25]

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C, § 227 (“TCPA”). Defendant Regal Medical Group, Inc., an organization that receives and responds to medical care requests for participants in HMO insurance plans, inadvertently entered Plaintiff Ashamad Pinchem’s cellphone number as the fax number of Dr. Cindy Huang in its database. Over the next 23 months, Regal attempted to send over 5,800 “faxes” Plaintiffs cellphone…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Penzer v. Transportation InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Guglielmo v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API