Legal Opinion
Cacho v. Ashcroft
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 1, 2004No. CV03-00185 DAE/KSCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF WHETHER THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER’S NATURALIZATION APPLICATION BASED ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
EZRA, Chief Judge.
The court heard Petitioner’s Motion on March 8, 2004. David P. McCauley, Esq., and Jamesner A. Dumlao, Esq., appeared at the hearing on behalf of Plaintiff; Ann Mei, Esq., and Thomas A. Helper, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared at the hearing on behalf of Respondents. After reviewing the motion and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sugarman v. DougallSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Tan v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 41 Manuel Augusto Santamaria-Ames, Aka: Manuel A. Santamaria-Ames v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, District DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gonzalez v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Lawson v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011