Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Conlin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 24, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.—Specific performance. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Lorin C. Collins, Judge, presiding. Bill and answer; trial on master’s report; decree for complainants; defendants appeal. Heard in this court at the March term, 1893, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Waterman, J.

It may be that the abstracts of title first furnished were not sufficient, but we think that the evidence sustains the conclusion of the court below, that appellant allowed further time in which to remedy the defects complained of.

We see no sufficient reason for interfering with the finding of the court, that appellees, within a reasonable time after the defects claimed were pointed out, furnished additional and sufficient abstracts.

Appellant, Jackson, received these additional abstracts December 15th. If before that time he had determined to wait no longer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Maynard v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Howe v. HutchisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gandhi v. BreckonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API