Legal Opinion

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Lassiter

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 21, 1952No. Record 3929PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The appellee suggests that this appeal should be dismissed for failure of appellant’s opening brief to give a fair statement of the facts pursuant to Rule 5:12, § 1 (c), which requires “A' clear and concise statement of the facts, with references to the pages of the printed record when there is any possibility that the other side may question the statement.” In Hall v. Hall, 181 Va. 67, 70, 23 S. E. (2d) 810, 811, a warning was given that failure to comply with this rule might result in denial or dismissal of the appeal or writ of error. While appellant’s brief is not remarkable for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. Franklin & Pittsylvania Railway Co. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Atlantic Life Insurance v. RingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  5. Harris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Board of County SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Gardner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Miller & Rhoads Bldg., L.L.C. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  4. Gregg v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. City of Chesapeake v. Gardner Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API