Legal Opinion

In re Hurowitz

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 20, 1935No. 55093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

Bankrupt’s petition for a discharge having been objected to and specifications of objections having been filed, the petition was referred to a referee in bankruptcy, who heard the parties and who has reported the facts to this court.

Before the hearing, but after the petition had been referred to the referee, the objecting creditor filed an amendment by way of substituted specifications which set forth new grounds of objections Wholly distinct from those originally specified.

The bankrupt moved, before the referee, that the amendment be denied and that the same be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lerner v. First Wis. Nat. Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. In re MercurDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. In re WestonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  4. In re KnaszakDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907
  5. Schlesinger v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northeastern Real Estate Securities Corp. v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. In re SchwartzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1936
  3. In re De CillisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
  4. In Re ShepherdDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
  5. In re TaubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API