Legal Opinion

Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for a preference on the calendar made after the case had been noticed for trial.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

This is a motion for a preference, but not made till February 14, 1910, after the case had been noticed for the December, 1909, term of this court. The preference is sought upon the ground that the plaintiff is ill with a progressive disease and will probably not survive the trial of the action, if he is compelled to wait until it is reached in its regular order upon the calendar; and it is urged that the cause he preferred, not only over the issues for the December term, hut also over issues upon preceding calendars awaiting trial.

It is clearly established that, in this county, applications *230f…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marks v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Schuman v. Brooklyn Heights R. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cohen v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plachte v. Bancroft Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Clarke v. Eighth Avenue RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. BermudezNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Holdridge v. CalderNew York Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API