Clarke v. Eighth Avenue Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion for a preference.
1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.
The legislature cannot deprive this court of its inherent power “ to control its order of business and to so conduct the same that the rights of all suitor's before ” it “ may be safeguarded.” Riglander v. Star Company, 98 App. Div. 101; affd., 181 N. Y. 531. Where the reasons for preferring a cause develop after the term, for which it was first noticed the court should nevertheless exercise its discretion and direct the preference. The affidavits here show satisfactorily why the motion was not noticed for the opening of the October term. On the. showing-made the discretion of the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Riglander v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Waters, Inc. v. Hatters' Fur Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Reinertsen v. Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- Riglander v. . Morning Journal AssociationNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plachte v. Bancroft Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- People v. BermudezNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Yellow Cab Manufacturing Co. v. Checker Cab Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923