Legal Opinion

Pacific Broadcasting Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1929No. Docket No. 7142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the taking of any further proceedings under an order appointing a receiver, upon the ground that said order is void for want of jurisdiction to make it.

It does not appear from the petition that any application has ever been made to the trial court to vacate the order now claimed to be void, and as held in Havemeyer v. Superior Court, 84 Cal. 327 [18 Am. St. Rep. 192, 10 L. R. A. 627, 24 Pac. 121, 141], “When a party has an opportunity of objecting in the lower court that it is proceeding or is asked to proceed in a matter without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lieberman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Campbell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Hanrahan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Santa Ynez Mercury Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Downtown Sunnyvale Residential v. Wells Fargo Bank CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Golden State Glass Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API