Legal Opinion
Vouras v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided November 3, 1982PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
In this appeal, the defendant, Edward Vouras, seeks reversal of his convictions of Advancing Gambling in the First Degree [11 Del.C. § 1403(1)] and Conspiracy in the Third Degree (11 Del.C. § 511) on the grounds that (1) the identification of his voice in a series of intercepted telephone conversations was unnecessarily suggestive and inherently unreliable; (2) the tapes of the conversations were not properly authenticated under Delaware Rule of Evidence 901; and (3) the Superior Court erroneously denied the defense motion for judgment of acquittal. As explained below, we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Deberry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Winer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.