Heinrich v. Pict. Rev. Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Appellants were injured by the negligent operation of an automobile driven by appellee’s crew manager, Kart-man. The car was not his, but was used by him to transport his crew from place to place soliciting subscriptions for appellee. Appellee knew of, but had not authorized the use of the automobile, nor hired it. The agent’s territory embraced Pennsylvania, southern New Jersey and Delaware. Kartman was paid a salary and commission with no allowance for the traveling expenses of himself and his crew. The details of his employment were left to him. He was not required to follow a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wesolowski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Gittelman v. Hoover CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Holdsworth v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Cesare v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.