Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Meehan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 25, 1901No. Nos. 12,766—(43)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Red Lake county by plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of James C. O’Brien, deceased, to recover $1,950 for labor performed for defendants by decedent. The case was tried before Watts, J., who found in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $892.79 and interest. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the findings or for a new trial, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion made by defendants’ •counsel upon several grounds “for judgment notwithstanding the findings, and, if denied, for a new trial,” in an action brought by plaintiff, as administrator, to recover for personal services rendered by his intestate to the defendants as co-partners.

The case was tried by the court without a jury, and upon its findings of fact judgment was ordered in favor of the plaintiff for $392.79, with interest. Counsel’s assignments of error are quoted verbatim, as follows:

“1. The complaint does not state a cause of action: (a) It does not…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Spongberg v. First National Bank of MontpelierIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Noble v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Shellburg v. Wilton BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API