Legal Opinion

Rawson v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Rule against sheriff and motion to distribute money. Decided by Judge Clarke. Randolph Superior Court. November Term, 1867. This case came up upon an agreed statement of facts, and without the record.

Read the full summary

Rule against sheriff and motion to distribute money. Decided by Judge Clarke. Randolph Superior Court. November Term, 1867. This case came up upon an agreed statement of facts, and without the record. William F. Davis, sheriff, had certain money arising from the sale of the property of Seaborn A. Smith, and William A. Rawson wished to have it applied to a fi. fa. which he held by transfer from Bemis & Prescott, plaintiffs in fi. fa., vs. said Smith, to the exclusion of the fi.fa. which had brought the money into court, and certain other fi. fas. These were all younger than Rawson’s fi,. fa.,…

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C. J.

' The error assigned to the judgment of the Court below in this case, is in deciding that the junior judgment creditors were entitled to the money, to the exclusion of the older ji. fa. The fi.fa. in favor of Bemis & Prescott, was levied upon the defendant’s property sufficient to satisfy the same. On the 5th day of November, 1858, the defendant paid part of the money due on the fi. fa., and the plaintiffs ordered the levy to be dismissed, the sheriff making the following entry on the fi. fa.: “Levy dismissed by order of the plaintiffs without a sale of the property.” Subsequently the ji. fa.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. COHEN Et Al. v. ROGERSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Hope v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Strobel v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API