Hope v. Underwood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. An execution against certain persons as makers and others as indorsers does not, without more, import that the latter are sureties, either as accommodation indorsers or otherwise; and, in the absence of further proof of their suretyship, they must be regarded as technical or regular indorsers. Sibley v. American Exchange Bank, 97 Ga. 126 (4) (25 S. E. 470); Booth v. Huff, 116 Ga. 8 (42 S. E. 381, 94 Am. St. R. 98); Chamblee v. Davie, 88 Ga. 205 (3) (14 S. E. 195); Warthen v. Melton, 132 Ga. 113 (2), 116 (63 S. E. 832, 131 Am. St. R. 184); Civil Code (1910), §§ 4279, 3556.
2. A levy upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sibley v. American Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Booth v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Warthen v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Chamblee v. DavieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Rawson v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strobel v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935