Legal Opinion
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 1, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1834PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. brings this action against defendant National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”) under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq. Plaintiff asks the Court to declare audiotapes created by former President William Jefferson Clinton and historian Taylor Branch during the Clinton administration to be “Presidential records” under the Presidential Records Act (“PRA”), 44 U.S.C. § 2203(f), and to order defendant “to assume custody and control” of them and deposit them in the Clinton…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Doyle v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- K-V Pharmaceutical Company v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Doe 1 v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.