Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Stockebrand
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from Woodson District Court. Action brought by Fisher against Ostmeir and another, on a promissory note. Trial at the June Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for defendant Stockebrand, as administrator of the estate of the defendant Orth, deceased, and against the plaintiff, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
"Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Paul Fisher against Frederick Ostmeir and R. Orth, on the following promissory note:
*566“$263. Humboldt, Kas., Jan. 8, 1876.
“ One year after date, we promise' to pay to the order of G. A. Fisher two hundred and sixty-three dollars, value received, with interest at 12 per cent, per annum from date until paid. Appraisement waived. Frederick Ostmeir.
E. Orth.”
• The plaintiff alleged in his petition that this note was given for $250, money loaned by the plaintiff to Frederick Ostmeir, Ostmeir being the principal on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. . SicklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Crain v. McGoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Liebbrandt v. Myron Lodge No. One, of the Old Free Order of ChaldeaIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamlen v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Mohan v. Woburn National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Smyser v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906