Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the plaintiffs’ motion to remand and defendant Chemcat Corporation’s motion to sever. For the reasons which follow, the motion to sever is DENIED, plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED. However, plaintiffs’ request for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs is DENIED.
I
This case arises from an alleged series of emissions of toxic pollutants from the St. Bernard parish plants of Mobil Oil Corporation, Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc., Chemcat Corporation, and Calciner Industries. The plaintiffs filed a class action in the Thirty-Fourth…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Averdick v. Republic Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1992
- French v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Haines v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
- Arzehgar v. DixonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
- Gutierrez v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.