Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Mathews

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1997No. C6-96-1362PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants challenge the district court’s order to sell decedent’s homestead to pay claims for decedent’s medical care. We affirm.

FACTS

Prior to his death in 1991, Marvin Mathews was at various times committed to health care facilities as mentally ill and mentally ill and dangerous. He was a patient at the St. Peter Regional Treatment Center, the Rochester State Hospital, and the Willmar Re*265gional Treatment Center, where the cost of his care was $396,544.33, and at the Ah-Gwah-Ching Nursing Home, where the cost of his care was $38,326.90.

Following Mathews’s death,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. JewisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. In Re Guardianship of HuesmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In re Conservatorship of BauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. OleanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API