Legal Opinion

Rory v. Continental Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2005No. Docket 126747Published

1Opinion of the Court

703 N.W.2d 23 (2005)

473 Mich. 457

Shirley RORY and Ethel Woods, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a CNA Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 126747. COA No. 5.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued March 8, 2005.

Decided July 28, 2005.

Hakim & Turfe (by David D. Turfe and Maroun J. Hakim), St. Clair Shores, MI, for the plaintiffs.

Garan Lucow Miller, P.C. (by Robert D. Goldstein and Jami E. Leach), Grand Blanc, MI, for the defendant.

Willingham & Cote, P.C. (by John A. Yeager, Matthew K. Payok, and Curtis R. Hadley), East Lansing, MI, for amici curiae Farm Bureau…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API