Legal Opinion

Shaw v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 9, 1991No. A91A1187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was tried before a jury and found guilty of robbery. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the trial court on the jury’s guilty verdict.

A witness for the State, who had originally been indicted for robbery, agreed to testify against appellant in return for a reduction in the charge to misdemeanor theft-by-taking and a probated sentence of 12 months. On direct and cross-examination, this witness was questioned and testified about her plea agreement. However, the trial court refused to allow appellant’s counsel to ask the witness…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Kinsman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  5. Janney v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. VoglesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Whitlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Hurston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API