Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. Allsop

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1995No. S-6472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) initiated support collection measures at the administrative level against William Allsop, whereupon Allsop sued his ex-wife and CSED to disestablish his paternity. CSED appeals from two aspects of the trial court’s decision: (1) its holding that such an action lies against the State; and (2) its decision to award Allsop full attorney’s fees based upon its finding that CSED litigated vexatiously and in bad faith. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that CSED is a proper defendant, but we vacate the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Keen v. RuddyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Crook v. Mortenson-NealAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Crittell v. BingoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. WethereltAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Herring v. HerringAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API