Legal Opinion · Dissent

Devault v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1986No. Docket 82088Published

1DissentT. M. Burns, J.

I respectfully dissent because I believe that the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board committed an error of law in determining that plaintiff’s injuries did not arise out of his employment.

While at work, plaintiff was assaulted by a co-employee. Plaintiff suffered serious head injuries and is now totally and permanently disabled. Plaintiff brought this workers’ compensation claim and a civil claim against the co-employee. The civil suit was dismissed on the basis that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy was under the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act.

A hearing referee ruled that plaintiff was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koschay v. Barnett Pontiac, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Schaefer v. Williamston Community SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. MacDonald v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Howard v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Brady v. Clark Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API