Legal Opinion

United States v. John Rudolph Crook

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 27, 1979No. 79-2559PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of a pro se petition for relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court.

On December 18, 1978, John Rudolph Crook, the appellant, entered a plea of guilty to one count of possession of heroin with intent to distribute. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment and ten years of special parole.

At the guilty plea proceedings, the district judge informed Crook that the maximum sentence for his offense was fifteen years or $25,000 or both, plus a special parole term of not less than three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lee Jackson Keel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Richard Lee Carbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Paul E. SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Thomas Dewey Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Derrick Downs-Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Edward Lee Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Hipolito Rivera-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. In Re HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API