Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Scardino
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 11, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In these actions of tort the plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries received on July 25, 1952, on the Southern Artery in Quincy when struck by an automobile operated by one Richard W. Boyd. There was testimony that at about 12:30 a.m. on that day the plaintiff, the defendants Scardino and Cenci, Mrs. Scardino, and four or five others agreed to drive to a certain restaurant in Boston in two automobiles. The plaintiff, Mrs. Scardino, and two of the men rode with Scardino in his automobile. The others rode with Cenci. While proceeding northerly on the Southern Artery Cenci had trouble…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Morrison v. MedagliaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Ruel v. LangelierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Slattery v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bagley v. BurkholderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Kunkel v. AlgerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Fitchburg-Leominster, Flying Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Nickerson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Santana v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.