Legal Opinion

Northwestern Bank v. Neal

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 30, 1978No. 20798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

The trial court held that a note endorsed to the appellant bank was not negotiable and that the bank, as a matter of law, was not a holder in due course. We reverse.

Respondent Neal purchased a boiler from Thomas Equipment & Supply Company on August 9, 1973. On that date, Neal executed two separate documents: a note in the sum of $8,714.72 and a conditional sales contract. On the same date, the note and conditional sales contract were discounted and assigned for valuable consideration by Thomas to the appellant bank. Thomas assigned its security interest in the boiler to the bank…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Commerce of Charlotte v. WatersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sunrise Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mariner's Cay Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Burch v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Swindler v. SwindlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API