Swindler v. Swindler
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, J.:
In this foreclosure action, we are asked to determine whether a promissory note secured by a real estate mortgage is a negotiable instrument governed by Article 3 of the South Carolina Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). James R. Swindler, Marshalene S. Frady, and Rebecca Spears (collectively, “the Swindler Family”) brought this action against their sister-in-law, Nancy Swindler (“Nancy”), to foreclose a mortgage encumbering a 54.5-acre tract of land Nancy purchased from their mother, Margaret Swindler (“Margaret”). Nancy asserted various defenses, including that Margaret had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Hawkins v. Bruno Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bergstrom v. Palmetto Health AllianceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Deep Keel, LLC v. Atlantic Private Equity Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- In Re NealsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Bostic v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007