Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Conner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for the conscious suffering and death of the plaintiff’s intestate, hereinafter referred to as the deceased. The defendant filed an answer containing a general denial and alleging contributory negligence and assumption of risk on the part of the deceased. The case was tried to a jury, and at the close of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict in her favor. The motion was denied and the defendant excepted. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant on the count for conscious suffering and a verdict for the plaintiff on the count for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. McGuire v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Glaser v. SchroederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Dixon v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Adams v. DuntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. GeigerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Hopkins v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Migliori v. Airborne Freight Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Ellmaker v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Sullivan v. Town of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API