Legal Opinion

People v. Bearss

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2001No. Docket 115665PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

After reversing defendant’s conviction for obtaining money by false pretenses, 1 the Court of Appeals remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment on a cognate offense. We granted leave to consider the constitutionality of this remedy. After deliberation, we find that the appellate court’s directed verdict violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. US Const, Am XTV.

i

Defendant Heather Anne Bearss and her friend, Tiffany Ruppert, visited Glen’s Market and Horizon Video in the Petoskey area. The two women selected a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. People v. Ora JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. LockettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. Konopka (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API