Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Ross & Hardies
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 10, 1998No. Civ.A. AW-97-2284PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
This ease involves a complaint by homeowners who believe they were victimized by a scheme involving the diversion of mortgage proceeds. Currently pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint filed by Defendant Ross & Hardies, a partnership law firm. A hearing was held in open court on November 24, 1997, and supplemental briefs were requested by the Court and received on May 1,1998. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Defendant’s Motion.
Factual Background
“In considering a motion to dismiss, the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fare Deals Ltd. v. World Choice Travel. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Chambers v. King Buick GMC, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Superior Bank, F.S.B. v. Tandem National Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Feld Entertainment, Inc. v. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Taylor v. BettisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.