Legal Opinion

United States v. Shane Olney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2017No. 16-30122UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Shane Olney appeals his conviction for sponsoring or exhibiting an animal in an unlawful animal fighting venture, 7 U.S.C. § 2156(a)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 2. He contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction and that the criminal statute, as applied to him, violates his free exercise rights under the First Amendment. We review both contentions de novo. See United States v. Begay, 42 F.3d 486, 497 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Ward, 989 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1992). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. We reject Olney’s challenge to the district…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Stormans Inc v. John WiesmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ORTEGA-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  2. Plumbar v. LandryDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021
  3. Plumbar v. LandryDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API