Legal Opinion

Friel v. Murchison

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1926No. 2442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit against the defendant's for $1,429.00. He alleges as a cause of action that he is the holder and owner in due course and for value and before maturity of a check for said amount dated April 17, 1924, made and signed by John M. Murchison, payable to plaintiff, and drawn on the Planters Bank at Cheneyville, Louisiana, which check was not paid on presentation.

It is alleged that John M. Murchison, who signed the check, is dead, and that the defendants are his heirs and legal representatives.

Defendants admit, in answer, that said check was signed and delivered to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Succession of CosteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  2. Pack v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
  3. Courtebray v. RilsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
  4. Martin v. DonovanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  5. Wooten v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Succession of GalianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Columbia Restaurant v. SadnovickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Friel v. MurchisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. McKnight v. CornetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Maison Blanche Co. v. PutfarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API