Legal Opinion
Arch Opening Steel Buck Corp. v. United Bonding Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 14, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 71-1796PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Defendant, United Bonding Insurance Co. (hereafter called United), by its statutory liquidator who was appointed by the Indiana State Court, contends that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution (Article IV, § 1) requires a stay of the proceedings before this court.
Plaintiff filed this action against Noe Construction Corporation seeking payment for materials supplied to Noe in Pennsylvania on a project insured by the Federal Housing Administration. United was the surety on the required materialmen’s bond, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Miller v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Com. Ex Rel. v. Consolidated Indem. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Arroyo v. Chesapeake InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lac D'amiante Du Quebec, Ltee v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Lac D'Amiante du Quebec v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Arch Opening Steel Buck Corp. v. United Bonding Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973