Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 27, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PREVENT CONTACT WITH FORMER OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., EMPLOYEE Defendant. DOCKET NO. 19 INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the complaint of plaintiff Buergofol GMBH alleging that defendant Omega Liner Company, Inc. (“Omega”) violated patents owned by plaintiff regarding pipe liners. Docket No. 1. Jurisdiction is premised on the presence of a federal question. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Now pending is a motion by plaintiff for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Hiawatha Nash v. Lee Roy Black, David Blackwell, Dale Riley, Gerald T. Frey, Donna Kay Brown and Mike CurranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Citibank (S.D.), N.A. v. HauffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Jerri Plummer v. Rhett McSweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Bryant v. Yorktowne Cabinetry, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.