Legal Opinion
Ashbourne v. Hansberry
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 17, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2017-0752Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANICA ASHBOURNE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-752 (LLA) v. DONNA HANSBERRY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Anica Ashbourne, an attorney proceeding pro se, alleges that the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) and DHS employees James Trommatter and Thomas Harker (collectively, the “DHS Defendants”) violated the Privacy Act and the Fifth Amendment when they found her “unsuitable” for employment with the U.S. Coast Guard. See ECF No. 1; ECF No. 30-1 at 2. The DHS Defendants now move…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.