Legal Opinion

Wilmington Trust Co. v. Copeland

Orphan's Court of Delaware

Decided July 31, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, Judge:

The plaintiffs are the executors under the will of Charles Copeland, deceased. Pursuant to the provisions *98of the Delaware Apportionment Statute1, the plaintiffs seek proration of the federal and Delaware estate taxes which have been levied against the estate of Charles Copeland and which have been paid by them as executors.

Insofar as need be stated here, the uncontroverted facts are these:

Charles Copeland died on February 3, 1944. His will, dated December 16, 1942, was duly probated and the plaintiffs qualified as executors thereunder. The plaintiffs filed federal and Delaware…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Hall v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hackett v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1933
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. RichardsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. Delaware Trust Co. v. BlackstoneCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilmington Trust Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API