Legal Opinion
State v. Quiroz
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1987No. 53129-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Two juvenile offenders challenge the use of a diversion agreement in their criminal history on the basis that the agreement violated their constitutional and statutory rights.
Facts
This is a consolidated case dealing with two juvenile offenders. David Quiroz pleaded guilty to one count of taking a motor vehicle without permission and one count of second degree burglary. These offenses occurred in October 1985, and Quiroz was sentenced on November 26,1985.
The Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, RCW 13.40, provides for very structured sentences, weighing both the severity of the offense as well as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re the Personal Restraint of KeeneWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- In RE SHEPPARD v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Burlingame v. Consolidated Mines and Smelting Co., Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Michel v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. SHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. S.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. MichaelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.