Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Kokemoor

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 4, 1994No. 93-3099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

Doctor Richard Kokemoor appeals a nonfinal order denying his motions to change the answers in the special verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. A jury found Donna Johnson was injured when Kokemoor failed to adequately inform her of the risks of surgery. Kokemoor argues that the court erred by admitting the following evidence: (1) That he had limited experience performing the surgical procedure, (2) that Johnson's risk of a bad outcome from the procedure was approximately 10% in the hands of a master surgeon, 15% on average, and 20% to 30% in Kokemoor's hands, and (3) that Kokemoor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. State v. DyessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Scaria v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hales v. PittmanArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bennett v. Larsen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson Ex Rel. Adler v. KokemoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Huss v. Yale Materials Handling Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Johnson v. KokemoorCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API