Legal Opinion

Conner v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1925No. 13486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was instituted by appellants, plaintiffs below, against appellees, defendants below, on the 21st day of January, 1920, in Ithe district court of Creek county, to recover possession of a one-half interest in 160 acres of land in Creek county, Okla., the allotment of their father, Thomas Conner, and for rents and royalties due plaintiffs derived from said lands, and for the cancellation of a certain guardian’s deed, wherein E. G. Bailey, guardian, was grantor and H. U. Bartlett, grantee, and all subsequent deeds and all orders and proceedings had in the probate court concerning same,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lomax v. PickeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Pratt v. RatliffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Comanche Ice Fuel Co. v. Binder HillerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shimonek v. TillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Fulsom v. Quaker Oil & Gas Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McCoy v. Provident Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API