Legal Opinion
State v. Zidel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 18, 2008No. 2006-549PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Marshall Zidel, appeals his conviction on nine counts of possession of child pornography, see RSA 649-A:3 (2007), arguing that the Superior Court (Lewis, J.) erred in denying his motions to dismiss. We reverse.
The following facts were found by the trial court for purposes of ruling upon the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss or were stipulated to by the parties. At the time he was arrested, the defendant worked as a photographer at a camp in Amherst for children fifteen years old and younger. In that capacity, the defendant took pictures that were to be used to make an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jane Doe v. Dean BolandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Theodore StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HotalingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- State v. KonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Doyle v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.