Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1996No. 63617-6PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

— The trial court dismissed a molestation charge against Defendant when it found the State did not introduce sufficient evidence to establish the corpus delicti of the crime, independent of Defendant’s confession. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and reinstated the charge. We find the corpus delicti was not established, so we reverse the Court of Appeals.

On August 25, 1992, at around 1:00 a.m., Defendant and his wife were asleep in their bedroom when their three-year-old daughter, L.R., came into the room and asked for a glass of water. The Defendant, who normally slept in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Allstate Insurance v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API