Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Peerless Portland Cement Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1927No. Docket No. 102PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I am not content with the opinion of Justice Bird. My views are expressed in Peckinpaugh v. H. W. Noble Co., ante, 464. I only care to supplement what I there said by the following quotation from Union Trust Co. v. Oliver, 214 N.Y. 517 (108 N.E. 809):

"While certificates of corporate stock lack some of the attributes of commercial paper and are, therefore, sometimes denominated only quasi negotiable, yet parties who deal in them innocently have long been protected by the law upon an analogous principle. Jarvis v. Manhattan Beach Co., 148 N.Y. 652 (43 N.E. 68, 31 L.R.A. 776, 51 Am. St. Rep.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Russell v. American Bell Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edgerly v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Knight, Exr. v. ShutzOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Frank v. McLain (In Re Peet Packing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  4. Bay City Bank v. St. Louis Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Morris v. Packard Dallas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API