Legal Opinion

William Waltz v. T. Miranda

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 3, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01282Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WILLIAM WALTZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-01282-KES-EPG-HC 10 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF PETITION 11 v. FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 12 T. MIRANDA, (ECF No. 1) 13 Respondent. 14 15 Petitioner William Waltz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 16 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner argues that (1) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of arson; and (2) his restitution was wrongly calculated. 17 For the reasons given below, the undersigned…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API