Legal Opinion

Tann v. Smyth

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1950No. 6108_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of the writ of habeas corpus to a prisoner held in custody under the judgment of a court of the state of Virginia. It does not appear that appellant has any merit in his petition or that he has exhausted his remedies under state law as required by 28 U.S. C.A. § 2254. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587. The order of the court below would be affirmed, therefore, if the appeal were properly before us. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253 and must accordingly be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bernard v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. SkeenDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1953
  2. Baker v. Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. Dean v. State of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1952
  4. Lyle v. Eidson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API