Legal Opinion
Ulmet v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 24, 1990No. 470-85CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
Once again, this case is before the court, this time pursuant to “Plaintiff’s Motion For Extension Of Time To File Notice Of Appeal.” Plaintiff’s original notice of appeal was received by the Clerk’s Office of the United States Claims Court late, on May 10,1990. Due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the filing deadlines, as prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the plaintiff’s papers were returned unfiled to the plaintiff’s counsel by the Clerk of the Court. Subsequently, on June 5, 1990, the plaintiff filed “Plaintiff’s Motion for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Parke-Chapley Construction Company, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff v. Thomas F. CherringtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- S. John Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., a Partnership, and Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., Albert M. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Estate Butler's Tire & Battery Co., Inc. v. Ferrous Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cleek Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991