Legal Opinion
Kanekoa v. City & County of Honolulu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1989No. Nos. 87-2636, 87-2844PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, Charles Ka-nekoa, Warren Kanekoa (the Kanekoas), and Damien Melemai challenge the judgments in their actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the city and county of Honolulu (Honolulu) for violating their fourth amendment rights to a prompt probable cause hearing. The Kanekoas and Mele-mai contend that the determinations of no constitutional violation were erroneous as a matter of law. The Kanekoas further argue that the district judge erred in (1) instructing the jury, (2) admitting evidence of the circumstances surrounding their arrests, and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert E. Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, and County of Los Angeles, University of California at Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Susan Hallstrom Robert Hallstrom v. City of Garden City Randy W. Snapp Sgt. Thurston Vaughn Killeen, Sheriff Mike RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Austin v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Monotype Corp. v. International Typeface Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Austin v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.