Legal Opinion
Roger Arkebauer v. Michael Kiley, Individually and as State's Attorney of Shelby County, Illinois
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 18, 1993No. 91-1058PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In exchange for a promise that he would not be prosecuted, the appellee, Roger Ark-ebauer, gave information to the Macon County State’s Attorney regarding Raymond Ruhl’s plan to murder his wife. Mr. Arkebauer was later indicted in Shelby County for his involvement in the scheme. The Illinois state trial court denied his motion to dismiss the indictment. The district court, however, entered a permanent injunction against the state prosecution on the ground that the doctrine of equitable immunity insulated Mr. Arkebauer from suit. Arkebauer v. Kiley, 751 F.Supp. 783…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Fred W. Phelps, Sr. And Edward F. Engel v. Joan Hamilton, in Her Official Capacity as District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Freeeats. Com, Inc. v. IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Oltremari Ex Rel. McDaniel v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitative ServiceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- United States v. Frank FuzerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Manu Patel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.