Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Seiz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided April 3, 1933No. 76Published

1Opinion of the Court

Shanaman, J.,

The Township of Lower Alsace instituted an action in assumpsit to recover from the defendant, Charles W. Seiz, as tax collector of Lower Alsace Township, and from David Bauer and George J. Goll, as sureties on Seiz’s bond, certain moneys alleged to be due for uncollected taxes, and for taxes collected but unremitted, assessed for the years 1931 and 1932. The taxes were the road, light, and hydrant taxes of the township. The suit was brought in the name of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to the use of the Township of Lower Alsace. The defendants filed an affidavit of defense…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GeeseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Ross Township v. GruverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Schuylkill County & Tamaqua Borough v. SitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Fabel v. MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. McCoach v. SheehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API