Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Appeal in Navajo County Juvenile Action No. JA-691

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 12, 1991No. 1 CA-JV 90-035Published

1DissentGrant, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The economic chaos which caused this mother to exhaust all of her options for child care and which finally caused the emotional duress leading to placement of her children with the state for adoption is starkly apparent from this record. Furthermore, the actions of the respondent and its counsel are less than admirable. The right to direct the up-bringing of one’s children “is one of the most basic of all civil liberties.” Flores v. Flores, 598 P.2d 893, 895 (Alaska 1979). The right to the care, custody, companionship, and control of one’s children “undeniably warrants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. In Re the Adoption of HolmanArizona Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API