Infinity Broadcasting Corp. v. New Jersey Meadowlands Commission
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
This appeal requires that we address the question whether an appeal from a decision of the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (Meadowlands Commission)1 lies directly in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court or in an action in lieu of prerogative writs in the Law Division of the Superior Court. Distinguishing actions challenging the Meadowlands Commission’s adoption of amendments to its landfill closure and redevelopment agreements from actions challenging the land use and takings aspects of those *215governmental actions, the Appellate Division held that an appeal from the former lies with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pascucci v. VagottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Northwest Covenant Medical Center v. FishmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Prado v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Meadowlands Regional Redevelopment Agency v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shim v. Rutgers-The State UniversitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Rinaldo v. RLR INV., LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- East Orange Board of Educ. v. SccNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- New Jersey Animal Rights Alliance v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP")New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Padna v. City C'cil of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.