Legal Opinion

United States v. Mackie

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 19, 2013No. 13-0184/AFPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

We grant review of this case to clarify that even after an initial appellate court decision, the Moreno standard for speedy post-trial review is still applicable as the case continues through the appellate process. 1 See United States v. Moreno, 63 M.J. 129, 142 (C.A.A.F.2006). However, we conclude that the post-trial delay was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Allison, 63 M.J. 365, 371 (C.A.A.F.2006).

Mackie was tried and convicted, pursuant to his pleas, at a special court-martial by military judge alone on September 2, 2006. 2 On September 24, 2007, the United States Air…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. United States v. MackieUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. JorellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  2. United States v. ArnoldUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  3. United States v. BlairUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  4. United States v. BooreUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. GnashUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API